Contact
Risepoint
700 North Pearl Street, Suite 600
Dallas, TX 75201
855-593-6050
Similar to course learning objectives (CLO), module learning objectives (MLO) are clear, specific statements of knowledge, skills, or behaviors that students will be able to perform at the conclusion of the module. Module learning objectives need to be specific and measurable; module learning objectives are more specific than and directly support the course learning objectives. Module learning objectives often break down larger course learning objectives into specific parts. For example, the course objective might be “analyze the impact of price on supply and demand in various markets;” a module objective might be “compare and contrast different types of markets.”
Clear and measurable module learning objectives outline what students will learn and how they will be assessed. Each module objective helps to define the needed learning content, determine the type of assessments used, and form a guide for the grading criteria or rubrics associated with the assessments. Writing specific module learning objectives hones in on the skill or concept students will achieve.
Also consider the QM standards that address module learning objectives:
Finally, module learning objectives allow the students to build understanding to master the larger course learning objectives. To show this relationship, you will align each module learning objective to one course learning objective. Let’s revisit our earlier example and add another objective:
For Module 4 the Module Learning Objectives are:
CLO1 represents alignment back to course learning objective 1, while CLO2 is an alignment to course learning objective 2. In the case of MLO1, there is a clear alignment to CLO1; MLO3 and MLO4 clearly align to CLO2. (Note that you will have more than one module objective aligned to each course objective). However, MLO2 could potentially align to either course learning objective or perhaps neither depending on the learning activities and assessments. In this case the ambiguity indicates a need to make the module learning objective more specific so there is a clear alignment to the course learning objective and a clear indication of what is truly being assessed.
What is the goal of this module learning objective? Are students going to be able to describe how unemployment and the Dust Bowl led to the Great Migration west and unemployment led to a migration from cities to rural areas? Or are students going to be able to describe how new job opportunities from the New Deal led to migrations and increased immigration? By revising the objective to, “Describe how unemployment and the Dust Bowl led to mass migrations,” we can clearly see the purpose of the objective and alignment to CO1. Perhaps, there is a need for a second objective as well: “Explain how the job opportunities presented from the New Deal impacted migration and immigration.” Crafting very specific module learning objectives can help you create a detailed outline for the course and make sure that you are teaching and assessing what you intend.
The following video will provide an overview of how to add module learning objectives.
Module objectives allow students to build their understanding and mastery, in a scaffolded manner, towards the broader course-level objectives. Course objectives sit at the higher course level, while module objectives are housed within the modules of the course. Because of this scaffolded structure, it is critical that module objectives are directly aligned to course objectives to ensure that materials provided to, and activities completed by, students in support of those module objectives will ultimately demonstrate mastery of course objectives. Course development efforts begin with course objectives. Using those as your starting point, break those broader objectives down into smaller ones – your module objectives. The learning content, activities, and assessments that are added to directly support the smaller module objectives are then assured of being aligned with the overarching course objectives. By going through this alignment process, you are ensuring that assessments measuring mastery of module material will also, in fact, be measuring mastery of the course objectives.
Learning activities are the actions or assessments that students complete in a course while the learning objective indicates what the students can do or know at the conclusion of instruction. Here are two quick definitions:
If you have a list of assessments and activities, you’d like to use in your course but haven’t yet drafted module objectives, try breaking the activity into relevant objectives for your course.
Use the examples below for guidance:
This open source provides an objective builder you may find helpful.
Alignment is the relationship between multiple course components from the module objectives (MO) and course objectives (CO) down to the assessments, activities, and content. To most easily illustrate the relationship among modules, you will align each component to module objectives and ultimately course objectives. The key to this is that module objectives can only align with one course objective. If there is a case where a module objective aligns to multiple course objectives, it is best to modify and refine the module objectives, so they align cleanly with one course objective. Let’s look at an example to illustrate this one-to-one alignment:
In the example above, MO1 demonstrates a clear alignment with CO1; MO3 and MO4 clearly align to CO2. However, MO2 could potentially align to either CO 1 or 2, or perhaps neither, depending on the learning activities and assessments. In this case, the ambiguity indicates a need to make MO2 more specific so there is a clear alignment with just one CO. As an added benefit to solidifying the module learning objective, this refinement helps provide a crystal-clear indication of what is truly being assessed. With this process, it is important to note that while you cannot align a MO to more than one CO, you can align one CO to more than one MO.
In revising the module objective, ask yourself, “What is the goal of this module objective?”
By revising the objective to “Describe how unemployment and the Dust Bowl led to mass migrations,” we can clearly see the purpose of the objective and its alignment now to CO1. There may be a need for a second objective as well, “Explain how the job opportunities presented from the New Deal impacted migration and immigration.” As an added benefit to these refinements, you can more easily and clearly develop assessments to accurately measure achievement of these tighter objectives.
Creating a one-to-one alignment between Module Objectives and a singular Course Objective will help you to adhere to best practices when mapping and designing your course.
For the sake of a clean one-to-one alignment, one course objective needs to be selected. In this case, consider what your goal is for the module objective. Do you want students to be able to relate the diseases and the symptoms to overall health, or should students be able to relate these diseases and symptoms to the impact they have on the digestive system? Perhaps they need to do both, but you are addressing these in different modules, so they can become distinct and specific module objectives. For example, “Describe symptoms of diseases that are related to the digestive system and how they impact the overall health.”
Module learning objectives often break down larger course learning objectives into specific parts. Specific and measurable module learning objectives can help you determine what types of assessments to incorporate and can form the basis of assignment grading criteria or rubrics. Acevedo, M. M. (2014) discusses the importance of collaboration between faculty and instructional designers to compose student-centered learning objectives. This paper addresses some common obstacles to this type of collaboration and offers strategies and solutions. Fink, L. D. (2003) offers a relational, integrated model for course design which prioritizes clear and measurable learning objectives. All course design models are undoubtedly influenced by the work of Gagné, R. M. (1965) who developed a nine-step model to designing course curriculum that mirrors the information processing model of mental events. Raible, J., Bennett, L., & Bastedo, K. (2016) provide information on areas in which faculty could improve their module learning objectives such as making sure that the action verb selected for the objective matches the associated assessment. Seery, Barreda, Hein, & Hilller (2021) provide a comprehensive review of factors impacting retention and strategies for increasing student persistence and motivation, and note how connecting curriculum to past experiences and future learning goals is a common course development strategy to support persistence among learners.
Acevedo, M. M. (2014). Collaborating with faculty to compose exemplary learning objectives. Internet Learning, 3(1), 5-16.
Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. University of Oklahoma, 27(11), 1-33.
Gagné, R. M. (1965). The analysis of instructional objectives for the design of instruction. Teaching machines and programmed learning II: Data and directions, 21-65.
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Raible, J., Bennett, L., & Bastedo, K. (2016). Writing measurable learning objectives to aid successful online course development. Int. J. for Scholarship of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1).
Seery, K., Barreda, A. A., Hein, S. G., & Hiller, J. L. (2021). Retention strategies for online students: A systematic literature review. Journal of Global Education and Research, 5(1), 72-84. https://www.doi.org/10.5038/2577-509X.5.1.1105.
Module objectives should be written from the student’s perspective and connect their current learning to future goals. Being able to see how the learning is connected increases students’ motivation, satisfaction, and persistence.
Live online course design and delivery webinars hosted by the Academic Services and Products team
Developed by Risepoint, Faculty eCommons (FeC) is a social learning ecosystem for faculty across the world to work together to improve online education. FeC contains resources specifically tailored to help online instructors and is maintained by the Academic Services and Products team at Risepoint.
The information provided on Faculty eCommons, including links to third-party websites, does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials on this website are for general informational purposes only.
Risepoint
700 North Pearl Street, Suite 600
Dallas, TX 75201
855-593-6050