Quality Review
The ASP Quality Review process combines the power of the Quality Matters process with a functionality and usability review. Quality reviewers provide you with recommendations and feedback that will enhance the student experience.
The ASP Quality Review process combines the power of the Quality Matters process with a functionality and usability review. Quality reviewers provide you with recommendations and feedback that will enhance the student experience.
Quality Matters (QM), a global organization leading quality assurance in online and innovative digital teaching and learning environments, has recently released their newest edition of the QM Higher Education Rubric.
This recorded webinar series provides supplementary guidance to faculty working with Academic Partnerships’ (AP) instructional designers (ID) and those seeking professional development opportunities to improve their online teaching and learning
Before developing your rubric, consider the assessment you are creating the rubric for. Ask yourself: Is my assessment developed completely? What are the course and module objectives aligned with the
Academic Partnerships (AP) is pleased to announce that all subscribing partners of AP and Quality Matters (QM) will benefit from enhancements made to QM’s Course Review Management System (CRMS). AP
Utilize the course checklist below to ensure that your course is ready to undergo a Quality Review by a QM Certified Course Reviewer. Course Self-Assessment Checklist Course Introduction Are there
Never worked in an LMS template before or worried about the course quality review process? Use our instructional designers’ favorite course building tips below to help prepare yourself for some
Quality Matters (QM) Specific Review Standard 2.1 can be one of the most challenging, but also one of the most rewarding, standards to meet in a quality review. Describing your
Ed Tech Tool Tip Quality Matters Standard 8.3 asks that your online course “provide accessible text and images in files, documents, LMS pages, and web pages to meet the needs
General Standard 5 addresses learning activities and learner interaction to meet the learning objective goals. This standard specifically addresses how learning activities provide opportunities for interaction that support active learning.
Standard 8.3 addresses the importance of providing alternative means of access to course materials in formats that meet the needs of diverse learners. One of the greatest advantages of online
Standard 1.1 focuses on making sure that learners know where to get started and find various components via the course introduction. At the most foundational level, before learners can proceed
Conferences Articles Artificial Intelligence Ed Tech Podcasts Reports Webinars Conferences SXSW EDU – South by Southwest – March 4–7 (Austin, TX)SXSW
What is Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy? Learn how educators are reframing Bloom’s Taxonomy through the lens of educational technology, blended learning,
What We’re Reading & Watching Conferences EdgeCon Winter 2024 – Edge, The Nation’s Nonprofit Technology Consortium – February 8 (Madison,
Register or Login to View this Page You must be a registered and approved Faculty eCommons member to access this
In addition to the overall attributes that AP recommends to help ensure an online program is competitive in the market,
Live online course design and delivery webinars hosted by the Academic Services and Products team
Developed by Academic Partnerships, Faculty eCommons (FeC) is a social learning ecosystem for faculty across the world to work together to improve online education. FeC contains resources specifically tailored to help online instructors and is maintained by the Academic Services and Products team at Academic Partnerships.
The information provided on Faculty eCommons, including links to third-party websites, does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials on this website are for general informational purposes only.